MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035277380 · doi:10.1175/jpo3022.1

On the Existence of Solitary Wave Solutions to the Shallow-Water Equations on the f Plane

2007· article· en· W2035277380 on OpenAlexaff
Marek Stastna, Francis Poulin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Physical Oceanography · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNavier-Stokes equation solutions
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInviscid flowCusp (singularity)Discontinuity (linguistics)Plane (geometry)Waves and shallow waterPhysicsBounded functionMagnitude (astronomy)MechanicsZonal and meridionalGeologyMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract In a recent paper Li argued that the inviscid shallow-water equations on the f plane exhibit a class of zonally propagating solitary wave solutions, referred to by the author as “geosolitary waves.” These solutions have propagation speeds that are slower than the shallow-water speed gH, and as constructed by Li, have a cusp in the height and zonal velocity field at the origin. The meridional velocity is found to be discontinuous at the origin, though its magnitude is much smaller than the magnitude of the zonal velocity. The authors reconsider the existence of geosolitary waves from the point of view of dynamical system theory and demonstrate that the cusp discontinuity at the origin is an unavoidable property of the solutions. Moreover, it is shown that, in contrast to suggestions made by Li, adding viscosity and diffusivity does not yield smooth, bounded solitary wave solutions. Last, the reason why geosolitary waves cannot be expected to exist in a continuously stratified fluid is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.109
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Physical OceanographySame topicNavier-Stokes equation solutionsFrench-language works237,207