JOHILLERITE FROM TOLBACHIK, KAMCHATKA PENINSULA, RUSSIA: CRYSTAL-STRUCTURE REFINEMENT AND CHEMICAL COMPOSITION
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Johillerite from a fumarole in the North Breach of the Great Fissure Tolbachik eruption (GFTE), Kamchatka Peninsula, Russia, monoclinic, a 6.7520(14), b 12.739(3), c 11.068(2) A, β 100.37(3)°, V 936.4(2) A3, I 2/ a , Z = 4 has been refined to an R 1 value of 3.2% for 1175 observed (| F o| ⋄ 4σ F ) reflections measured with a Bruker P 4 diffractometer equipped with a CCD detector. The crystal used for the collection of the X-ray intensity data was subsequently analyzed with an electron microprobe; the resulting structural formula is Na0.77 K0.03 Pb0.01 Ca0.01 Mn0.01 2+ Zn0.13 Mg2.18 Cu1.55 2+ Fe0.26 3+ Al0.06 (As2.96 5+ P0.04) O12. The unusual feature of the johillerite structure is the A (1)’ site, a square-planar-coordinated site fully occupied by Cu2+, that is displaced ¼ along x. The A (2) site is similar to that in other alluaudite-group minerals, surrounded by eight O-atoms with a distance of 2.70 A, and occupied by Na plus small amounts of other large cations. The refined site-scattering values and observed distances at the M (1) and M (2) sites are in accord with occupancy primarily by Mg, with Cu2+ at M (1) and Cu2+ + Fe3+ + Al at M (2). Relative to the compositions of the arsenate minerals arseniopleite and caryinite, Cu2+ has replaced Ca in the formula of johillerite. In arseniopleite and caryinite, Ca (+ Na) at the A (1) site is [7]- or [8]-coordinated, and the resulting sites occur in chains of edge-sharing coordination polyhedra extending in the a direction. Rather than replacing Ca at the center of the A (1) polyhedron, Cu2+ in johillerite occurs close to the edge shared between adjacent polyhedra, adopting square-planar coordination that is common for Cu2+.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".