Asymptotically Optimal Approximation of Single Qubit Unitaries by Clifford and<mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><mml:mi>T</mml:mi></mml:math>Circuits Using a Constant Number of Ancillary Qubits
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Decomposing unitaries into a sequence of elementary operations is at the core of quantum computing. Information theoretic arguments show that approximating a random unitary with precision $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ requires $\ensuremath{\Omega}\mathbf{(}\mathrm{log}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathbf{)}$ gates. Prior to our work, the state of the art in approximating a single qubit unitary included the Solovay-Kitaev algorithm that requires $O\mathbf{(}{log}^{3+\ensuremath{\delta}}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathbf{)}$ gates and does not use ancillae and the phase kickback approach that requires $O\mathbf{(}{log}^{2}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathrm{log}\mathrm{log}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathbf{)}$ gates but uses $O\mathbf{(}{log}^{2}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathbf{)}$ ancillae. Both algorithms feature upper bounds that are far from the information theoretic lower bound. In this Letter, we report an algorithm that saturates the lower bound, and as such it guarantees asymptotic optimality. In particular, we present an algorithm for building a circuit that approximates single qubit unitaries with precision $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ using $O\mathbf{(}\mathrm{log}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathbf{)}$ Clifford and $T$ gates and employing up to two ancillary qubits. We connect the unitary approximation problem to the problem of constructing solutions corresponding to Lagrange's four-square theorem, and thereby develop an algorithm for computing an approximating circuit using an average of $O\mathbf{(}{log}^{2}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathrm{log}\mathrm{log}(1/\ensuremath{\epsilon})\mathbf{)}$ operations with integers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it