Imaging early-stage corticobasal degeneration with [99mTc]TRODAT-1 SPET
Bibliographic record
Abstract
AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the nigrostriatal dopaminergic function in patients with corticobasal degeneration (CBD) using [2-[[2-[[[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-8-methyl-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]oct-2-yl]methyl](2-mercaptoethyl)amino]ethyl]amino]ethanethiolato(3-)-N2,N2',S2,S2']oxo-[1R-(exo-exo)]-[99mTc]technetium ([99mTc]TRODAT-1) brain single-photon emission tomography (SPET). METHODS: Five patients with probable CBD, 10 age- and duration-matched patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease (IPD) and 10 age-matched healthy volunteers completed the SPET study. The images were obtained 4 h after intravenous injection of 925 MBq of [99mTc]TRODAT-1. Using a magnetic resonance imaging atlas of the striatum, the ratios of specific striatal binding to non-specific occipital binding were calculated. RESULTS: Clinical analysis showed that the CBD patients obtained significantly higher scores on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale and a significantly worse score for activities of daily living. In the CBD and IPD groups, striatum-occipital/occipital, caudate nucleus-occipital/occipital and putamen-occipital/occipital ratios decreased significantly relative to those of healthy subjects. No statistical difference could be found between the CBD and IPD groups for these ratios, although relatively even, decreased uptakes in the caudate nucleus and putamen were found in the CBD group. On further analysis of the index of binding reduction, the differences between the caudate nucleus and putamen were significantly lower in the CBD group than in the IPD group. The striatal uptake of [99mTc]TRODAT-1 showed a distinct asymmetry in both the CBD and IPD patients. CONCLUSION: From this study, it can be concluded that early-stage CBD patients have a worse performance and more difficulties with daily activities than IPD patients. CBD patients demonstrated essentially similar patterns of [99mTc]TRODAT-1 binding as those with IPD. However, there was relatively more homogeneous involvement of the caudate nucleus and putamen in the CBD patients. This provides information about the differences between these patients in the early stages.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".