Juvenile Psoriatic Arthritis (JPsA) clinical features and outcome of 119 patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To determine the long-term outcome of a single center cohort of children with JPsA. Clinical records of 122 patients meeting the Vancouver or ILAR criteria for JPsA were reviewed. Patients were divided into 4 groups depending on their clinical features: a)Oligoarticular, b)RF(-) polyarticular, c)RF(+) polyarticular and d)enthesitis related arthritis (ERA). Patient characteristics and clinical features at onset and during follow-up were determined. The cohort consisted of 119 patients, 59(49.6%) had polyarticular course, 54(47.8%) were RF(-) and 4(3.3%) RF(+), 44 patients(38.3%) had oligoarticular course and 16(13.4%) ERA. At diagnosis patients with ERA were older as compared to patients with oligoarticular and polyarticular course (11.6 ± 2.2 years vs 7.7 ± 4.3 years and 7.1 ± 4.5 years respectively p = 0.001). Patients with polyarticular course had more MCP, PIP and wrist involvement when compared to patients with oligoarticular course and with ERA (p < 0.001 for all). Patients with ERA had significantly more hip and sacroiliac involvement compared to the other groups (p < 0.001 for both). Nail changes was seen in 66 patients (57%) and was associated with DIP involvement at presentation (p = 0.0034).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".