MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035305579 · doi:10.5489/cuaj.1574

45,X/46,XY mixed gonadal dysgenesis: A case of successful sperm extraction

2014· article· en· W2035305579 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Ryan Flannigan, Victor Chow, Sai Ma, Albert Yuzpe

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Urological Association Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal Abnormalities
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntracytoplasmic sperm injectionGonadal dysgenesisSpermInfertilityAzoospermiaMale infertilityDysgenesisTesticular sperm extractionAndrologyBiologyAneuploidyGynecologyMedicineAnatomyGeneticsPregnancyChromosome

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Infertility is common among couples, about one third of cases are the result of solely male factors, and rarely abnormalities of genetic karyotypes are the root cause. Individuals with a 45X,/46,XY mosaiscism are rare in the literature and very few have fertile potential. We discuss a case of a 27-year-old male with known mixed gonadal dysgenesis, 50:50 split mosaiscism of 45,X/46,XY, presenting for evaluation of 1.5 year history of infertility. He demonstrated low volume non-obstructive azoospermia. Upon testicular biopsy, spermatozoa were extracted. These sperm were subjected to aneuploidy studies demonstrating 95.95% euploidy. The sperm were further assessed and placed in cryopreservation after being deemed sufficient for potential intracytoplasmic sperm injection. This is a unique case of viable sperm in a man with mixed gonadal dysgenesis, 45,X/46,XY mosaiscism.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Urological Association JournalSame topicGenetic and Clinical Aspects of Sex Determination and Chromosomal AbnormalitiesFrench-language works237,207