Routing, Scheduling and Power Allocation in Generic OFDMA Wireless Networks: Optimal Design and Efficiently Computable Bounds
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to determine the data routes, subchannel schedules, and power allocations that maximize a weighted-sum rate of the data communicated over a generic OFDMA wireless network in which the nodes are capable of simultaneously transmitting, receiving and relaying data. Two instances are considered. In the first instance, subchannels are allowed to be time-shared by multiple links, whereas in the second instance, each subchannel is exclusively used by one of the links. Using a change of variables, the first problem is transformed into a convex form. In contrast, the second problem is not amenable to such a transformation and results in a complex mixed integer optimization problem. To develop insight into this problem, we utilize the first instance to obtain efficiently computable lower and upper bounds on the weighted-sum rate that can be achieved in the absence of time-sharing. Another lower bound is obtained by enforcing the scheduling constraints through additional power constraints and a monomial approximation technique to formulate the design problem as a geometric program. Numerical investigations show that the obtained rates are higher when time-sharing is allowed, and that the lower bounds on rates in the absence of time-sharing are relatively tight.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".