L’implication de l’Union européenne dans la résolution des conflits au Caucase du Sud
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’Union européenne (ue) a joué un rôle premier comme médiateur dans la guerre qui a opposé en août 2008 la Géorgie et la Russie. Pourtant, l’uereste un acteur secondaire dans la région, peinant à s’immiscer dans les processus de résolution de conflit mis en place depuis la fin des différents conflits en Abkhazie, en Ossétie du Sud et au Nagorno-Karabakh. Cet article interroge l’échec relatif de l’ue>à peser sur les processus de résolution des conflits gelés au Caucase du Sud. Il examine les logiques propres à l’uequi expliquent les impasses auxquelles elle doit faire face dans la région : les incertitudes et les ambiguïtés qui entourent la Politique européenne de voisinage (pev) et les autres instruments mobilisés au Caucase du Sud, les divisions et les concurrences intra-européennes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".