Effect of an ethanol/trisodium citrate hemodialysis catheter locking solution on isolates of <i>Candida albicans</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We conducted an in vitro study to assess the effect of a 30% ethanol/4% trisodium citrate (TSC) catheter locking solution on isolates of Candida albicans. Twelve isolates obtained from human blood cultures were tested in control solutions composed of broth and normal saline, and a test solution of 30% ethanol, 4% TSC, and broth. Colony counts were determined for control and test solutions at baseline and after 1, 24, and 48 hours of exposure. After 48 hours, the remaining test solution was filtered through a sterile filter funnel and rinsed with 10 mL of sterile water. Filters were aseptically transferred to agar plates and incubated for 24 hours. Control solutions grew well over the incubation period, as expected. In contrast, no viable growth was observed in test solutions 1 hour after instillation of the ethanol/TSC locking solution, or throughout the 48-hour study duration. Additionally, filters from test solutions displayed no growth. We conclude that a 30% ethanol/4% TSC catheter locking solution eradicated all isolates of C. albicans within 1 hour of exposure in this in vitro study, and shows promise as a new hemodialysis catheter locking solution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".