Comparison of Internal and Residual Stresses Measured by Strain-Dip Test and XRD during High Temperature Deformation of Al-Mg Solid Solutions
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Creep behavior of solid solution alloys are reasonably explained by concepts of the “internal and effective stress of high temperature deformation”. The internal stress is considered to be brought by formation of dislocation substructures, and the dislocation structures should have caused long range stress filed in interior of materials. Thus, residual stresses should also be brought by the same origin. In this paper, measurements of the residual stresses after creep deformation by 2D-Xray method are attempt, and the stresses are compared with so-called the “internal stress of high temperature deformation” measured by strain-dip stress-transient test. Although, the stress tensor depends on the deformation condition, the relation with the applied stress show complex manner at a glance. The maximum principal stresses, however, show relatively smaller than the applied stress, and fairly agree with that measured by strain-dip stress-transient technique. Importance of further considerations of the origin of so-called internal stresses is suggested.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".