Defending, Reclaiming and Reinventing the Commons
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT ABSTRACT This study addresses the following questions: Who destroys the commons? Why have the commons to be reinvented? Can there be something like global commons? What can 'new commons' be in rich industrialized countries? The authors argue that there can be no reinvention of the commons in the industrialized North without a defense of the commons in the largely subsistence-based South. They identify two opposed concepts of 'reinventing the commons:' first, that which means to defend, to reclaim and to reinvent the commons from below, through grassroots action of local people for local people; and, second, the concept constructed and invented from above, namely the concept of 'global commons,' which is being introduced by international agencies and global players, mostly for the benefit of TNCs. The authors conclude that commons cannot exist without a community but equally the community cannot exist without economy, in the sense of oikonomia, that is, the reproduction of human beings within the social and the natural household. Hence, reinventing the commons is linked to the reinvention of the communal or commons-linked economy. RÉSUMÉ Cette étude porte sur les questions suivantes: Qui a détruit la commune civile? Pourquoi doit-elle être réinventée? Existent-ils des biens publics globaux? De quoi s'agit-il quand on fait référence à la « nouvelle commune » dans les pays riches et industrialisés? Les auteures avancent qu'il est impossible de réinventer la commune dans le Nord industrialisé sans que celles du Sud, largement basées sur la subsistance, ne soient pas protégées. Elles présentent deux concepts opposés de la « réinvention des biens civils communs »: le premier, celui qui signifie défendre, réclamer et réinventer la commune civile par le bas, à travers l'action de la communautè locale à ses propres fins; et le deuxième, celui de construire et d'iventer à partir d'en haut, à savoir le concept des « biens publics globaux », qu'ont introduit les multinationales et leurs dépositaires dans la scène globale, essentiellement au profit des corporations transnationales. Les auteures concluent que la commune civile ne pourrait exister sans une communauté, mais que la communauté ne pourrait exister, non plus, sans une économie, dans le sens de l'oikonomia, c'est-à-dire, la reproduction des êtres humains dans leurs foyers sociaux et naturels. La réinvention de la commune civile doit donc être liée à la réinvention de l'économie communautaire ou à l'économie de commune civile.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it