MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Bioactive Glass Scaffolds with Hierarchical Structure and their 3D Characterization

2010· article· en· W2035348878 on OpenAlex
Julian R. Jones, Peter Lee

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueKey engineering materials · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicBone Tissue Engineering Materials
Canadian institutionsKensington Health
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsScaffoldMaterials scienceBone structureNanoporeMacroporeNanoporousBiomedical engineeringBioactive glassPorosityNanotechnologyComposite materialChemistryEngineeringCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone tissue has evolved into hierarchical three-dimensional structures with dimensions ranging from nanometres to metres. The structure varies depending on the site in the body, which is dictated by the loading environment. Medically, bone is one of the most replaced body parts (second only to blood) but replicating these complex living hierarchical structures for the purpose of regenerating defective bone is a challenge that has yet to be overcome. A temporary template (scaffold) is needed that matches the hierarchical structure of native bone as closely as possible that is available ‘off the shelf’ for surgeons to use. After implantation the scaffold must bond to bone and stimulate not only three dimensional (3D) bone growth, but also vascularisation to feed the new bone. There are many engineering design criteria for a successful bone scaffold and bioactive glass foam scaffolds have been developed that can fulfil most of them, as they have a hierarchical porous structure, they can bond to bone, and they release soluble silica species and calcium ions that have been found to up-regulate seven families of genes in osteogenic cells. Other ions have also been incorporated to combat infection and to counteract osteoporosis. Their tailorable hierarchical structure consists of highly interconnected open spherical macropores, further, because the glass is sol-gel derived, the entire structure is nanoporous. The macropores are critical for bone and blood vessel growth, the nanopores for tailoring degradation rates and protein adsorption and for cell attachment. This chapter describes the optimised sol-gel foaming process and how bone cells respond to them. Whatever type of scaffold is used for bone regeneration, it is critically important to be able to quantify the hierarchial pore structure. The nanopore size can be quantified using gas sorption, but to obtain full information of the macropore structure, imaging must be done using X-ray microtomography and the resulting images must be quantified via 3D image analysis. These techniques are reviewed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.162
Teacher spread0.159 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it