MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035374472 · doi:10.1136/jramc-153-04-13

Military Intensive Care Part 1. A Historical Review

2007· review· en· W2035374472 on OpenAlexaff
JD Henning, MJ Roberts, Deep Sharma, Andrew R. Hoffman, PF Mahoney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Army Medical Corps · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntensive careMilitary personnelMilitary medicineMedical emergencyProduct (mathematics)MedicineIntensive care medicinePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ICU is a product of clinical developments, technological advances, social changes and history. Military ICU reflects all of these as well as deployed operational experience. Having considered how military ICU got to where it is, the next article will consider current practice.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.427
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.461
Teacher spread0.308 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Army Medical CorpsSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207