MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035399704 · doi:10.1115/imece2014-37571

Analytical Models to Determine the Electric Field Characteristics of a Multi-Electrode Impedimetric Immunosensor in a Digital Microfluidic Device

2014· article· en· W2035399704 on OpenAlexafffund
Steffen Blume, Michael J. Schertzer, Ridha Ben Mrad, Pierre E. Sullivan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectrowetting and Microfluidic Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPublic Health Agency of CanadaCMC Microsystems
KeywordsMicrofluidicsDigital microfluidicsLab-on-a-chipComputer scienceFinite element methodElectronic engineeringElectrodeNanotechnologyElectrowettingMaterials scienceOptoelectronicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The level of integration of digital microfluidics is continually increasing to include the system path from fluid manipulation and transport, on to reagent preparation, and finally reaction detection. Digital microfluidics therefore has the capability to encompass all steps of common biochemical protocols. Reported here is a set of analytical models for the design of a coplanar interdigitated multi-electrode array to be used as an impedimetric immunosensor in a digital microfluidic device for on-chip chemical reaction detection. The models are based on conformal mapping techniques, and are compared to results obtained from finite element analysis to discuss limitations of the model. The analytical models are feasible and inexpensive surrogates for numerical simulation methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.149
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicElectrowetting and Microfluidic TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207