MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035403324 · doi:10.1095/biolreprod.104.030726

Developmental Pattern of Small Antral Follicles in the Bovine Ovary1

2004· article· en· W2035403324 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiology of Reproduction · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyAntral follicleFollicleOvulationOvarian follicleEndocrinologyUltrasonographyInternal medicineAndrologyFollicular phaseMedicineHormoneSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study was designed to characterize the developmental pattern of 1- to 3-mm follicles and to determine the stage at which the future dominant follicle first attains a size advantage among its cohorts. In experiment 1, heifers (n = 18) were examined every 24 h by transrectal ultrasonography for one interovulatory interval (IOI). In experiment 2, cows (n = 9) were examined every 6 h from 5 to 13 days after ovulation to monitor precisely the diameter changes of individual follicles >/=1 mm during emergence of wave 2. Results revealed a change over days (P < 0.05) in the number of 1- to 3-mm follicles, with a maximum (P < 0.05) 1 or 2 days before wave emergence (conventionally defined as the time when the dominant follicle is first detected at 4 mm), followed 3-4 days later by a maximum (P < 0.05) in the number of >/=4-mm follicles. The profiles of small (1-3 mm) and large (>/=4-mm) follicles were inversely proportional (r = -0.79; P = 0.01). The profile of the number of 1- to 3-mm follicles during wave emergence was similar (P = 0.63) between waves in two-wave IOI, but differed (P < 0.01) among waves in three-wave IOI as a result of a greater number of follicles in the ovulatory wave (P < 0.04). As well, the number of follicles in the ovulatory wave tended to be greater (P < 0.06) in three-wave IOI than in two-wave IOI. The future dominant follicle was first identified at a diameter of 1 mm and emerged 6-12 h earlier than the first subordinate follicle (P < 0.01). After detection of the dominant follicle at 1 mm (0 h), its diameter differed from that of the first and second subordinate follicles at 24 h (P = 0.04) and 12 h (P = 0.01), when the dominant follicle was 2.4 +/- 0.17 mm and 1.7 +/- 0.14 mm, respectively. The growth rate of the dominant follicle differed from that of the first and second subordinate follicles at 120 h (P = 0.03) and 108 h (P = 0.02), when the dominant follicle was 9.5 +/- 0.30 mm and 8.8 +/- 0.49 mm, respectively. Emergence of the future dominant (r = 0.71), first (r = 0.73), and second (r = 0.76) subordinate follicles was temporally associated (P < 0.01) with a rise in circulating concentrations of FSH. Transient, nocturnal elevations in plasma FSH concentration were followed within 6 h by an increase in the growth rate of 1- to 3-mm follicles. We conclude that 1) 1- to 3-mm follicles develop in a wave-like manner in association with surges in plasma concentrations of FSH, 2) 1- to 3-mm follicles are exquisitely responsive to transient elevations in FSH, and 3) selection of the dominant follicle is manifest earlier than previously documented and is characterized by a hierarchical progression over a period encompassing the entire FSH surge (5 days).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.179

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it