MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Editorial: Review of the “BEST” Book Ever on the Technology of Cheesemaking

2009· editorial· en· W2035429955 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Manfred Kröger

Bibliographic record

VenueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · 2009
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicProbiotics and Fermented Foods
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubject (documents)Library scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Occasionally truly comprehensive books appear that astound and even intimidate. When a single author is behind such a work, it also triggers admiration. Encyclopedic and multi-author volumes cannot be composed by individuals. To have a single subject treated exhaustively by one author requires many years of undivided and dedicated attention. As a result, fewer and fewer such all-encompassing compendia are produced by just one person. Joseph Kammerlehner, however, has done it. He has spent 6 decades with milk and its conversion to cheese and has diligently put order into that complicated subject. After a productive career as a cheesemaker, dairy plant manager, and researcher and instructor at the Technical Univ. Munich-Weihenstephan, he is definitely and superbly qualified to tell others about his professional experiences. He not only produced dozens of technical journal articles, but also a 3-volume standard textbook on rennet cheese technology (1986, '88, and '89). In 2003 much of that information became the core of Kammerlehner's well-received 896-page text and reference book “Kaesetechnologie” of which reviewers expressed the need for its translation from German into English. The man to perform that arduous task was Axel Mixa, an experienced and widely traveled dairy technologist who had done other translations of dairy material (such as the Edgar Spreer book “Milk and Dairy Product Technology” published in 1998 by Marcel Dekker in New York). The Kammerlehner book now stands at the pinnacle of all cheese technology literature. More than 50 years ago, I learned cheesemaking as a dairy technology apprentice in (West) Germany. A master cheesemaker's memory and a few lines of written instruction were all that was needed for the steady daily output of Edam cheese. Several years later I was making small weekly batches of Canadian Cheddar cheese at the Dairy Science Dept. of the Univ. of Manitoba; and the helpful manual at that time was G.H. Wilster's spiral-bound “Practical Cheese Manufacture and Cheese Technology,” 7th edition, of 1951. A few years after that I found myself teaching cheesemaking to dairy science students at The Pennsylvania State Univ., ably assisted with advice from Frank V. Kosikowski's “Cheese and Fermented Milk Products.” After Professor Kosikowski's death, this highly successful practical book was republished as the 3rd edition, in 2 volumes, by one of his former students at Cornell Univ., now a professor at South Dakota State Univ. (F.V. Kosikowski and V.V. Mistry, 1997). I thought I knew it all, until at the end of my food science career I discovered Kammerlehner's massive German book on cheese technology. It certainly eclipsed similar ones on the subject that had appeared in the 1980s which, by the way, and as indicated above, were written by groups of authors and not individuals. There was “Cheesemaking” by A. Eck (editor), in 1987, and “Cheese” by P.F. Fox (editor), also in 1987. Kammerlehner's opus is studded with chemical, physical, microbiological, operational, and other details, all meticulously supported by referenced sources. The most unique and credible statements, however, are the author's descriptions of specific processes. The voice of the experienced cheesemaker can then be heard outlining the likely negative outcome of an operation or situation should the pH be too high or too low or the concentration of this or that not be exact. There are 9 parts to this book of 930 pages: 1. Basics, 42 p.; 2. Rennet cheese, 681 p.; 3. Fresh cheese, fresh cheese preparations, 69 p.; 4. Acid curd cheese (ripened), 34 p.; 5. Cooked cheese, 14 p.; 6. Processed cheese, 57 p.; 7. Whey cheese, 15 p.; 8. Whey and whey products, 50 p.; and 9. Cheese from milk of mammals other than dairy cows, 45 p. A list of abbreviations and conversions adds another 4 and the index another 16 pages. The 203 figures, 269 tables, and 20 process flow schemes provide effective overviews and define this book also a valuable reference source. Part 2, the longest, is divided into 9 chapters consisting of the following: 2.1, Milk in general, 37 p.; 2.2, Milk for cheesemaking, 83 p.; 2.3, Additives used in cheesemaking, 70 p.; 2.4, Processing from renneting to curd treatment, 70 p.; 2.5, Curd processing, 33 p.; 2.6, Cheese ripening, 63 p.; 2.7, Rennet cheese packaging, 19 p.; 2.8, Cheese yield and specific varieties, 78 p.; and 2.9, Cheese quality and defects, 129 p. So, overall, the book has 17 chapters, and each has its own Bibliography. I predict this book will be highly praised by the English-reading dairy audience: not only by practice-oriented milk and cheese experts, but especially the researchers, instructors, and students worldwide. All topics dealt with are solidly steeped in accepted scientific facts. The 1780 literature citations vouch for that. The author, in the interest of making it affordable, has self-published this book; and the printing and binding was done masterfully by Italian craftsmen. It may be examined at http://www.cheese-technology.com. And now a commercial message: “Cheese Technology” by Josef Kammerlehner, 930 p., publication year 2009, ISBN 978-3-00-021038-9, is available for 198 Euros (plus shipping charges) from Publishing House J. Kammerlehner, Burgrainer Str. 9, D-85354 Freising, Germany (FAX: 08161/63510; e-mail: [email protected]).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: Editorial
Teacher disagreement score0.040
Threshold uncertainty score0.133

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0070.004
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0070.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.061

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueComprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food SafetySame topicProbiotics and Fermented FoodsFrench-language works237,207