MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035434405 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.82.174435

Transition temperature and magnetic properties of the granular Ising model in two dimensions studied by Monte Carlo simulations: Impact of intragrain spin structure

2010· article· en· W2035434405 on OpenAlexafffund
Martin LeBlanc, M. L. Plumer, J. P. Whitehead, J. I. Mercer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicTheoretical and Computational Physics
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsCondensed matter physicsMonte Carlo methodIsing modelSpinsMagnetizationPhysicsScalingMaterials scienceMagnetic fieldQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Monte Carlo simulations are performed on a stacked square lattice model of weakly interacting magnetic grains composed of Ising spins. The role of intragrain spin structure on thermal properties are investigated in this simple representation of granular recording media. Various thermodynamic quantities are calculated using a cluster-flip algorithm which exhibit anomalies corresponding to both intragrain and intergrain ordering. In the single-layer case, the intergrain transition temperature vs intergrain exchange coupling strength exhibits a crossover to a nonlinear regime where the intragrain spin structure becomes increasingly important. Corresponding results on multilayer systems are shown to be in good agreement with scaling theory. Preliminary magnetization vs applied field $(M\text{\ensuremath{-}}H)$ loops are also calculated as a function of temperature and indicate the possible effect of the grain spin structure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.289

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicTheoretical and Computational PhysicsFrench-language works237,207