MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035457339 · doi:10.1002/art.20861

Long‐term open‐label preliminary study of the safety and efficacy of leflunomide in patients with polyarticular‐course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis

2005· article· en· W2035457339 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArthritis & Rheumatism · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune and Inflammatory Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsMontreal Children's HospitalHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of British ColumbiaChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioSickKids FoundationUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeflunomideMedicineJuvenile rheumatoid arthritisRheumatoid arthritisMethotrexateInternal medicineRheumatologyArthritisRefractory (planetary science)Surgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: To obtain preliminary data regarding the efficacy and long-term safety of leflunomide in patients with refractory polyarticular-course juvenile rheumatoid arthritis (JRA). METHODS: Twenty-seven patients were entered into the initial 26-week open-label study of leflunomide therapy; 17 entered the extension phase (maximum 107 weeks). Mean disease duration at study entry was 7.0 years. All patients had >or=5 joints with active arthritis and had received methotrexate for a mean of 36.0 months. Following a loading dose, patients initially received leflunomide at a dosage of 10 mg/1.73 m(2)/day, which could be increased to 20 mg/1.73 m(2)/day (maximum 20 mg/day) beginning at week 8. The primary efficacy outcome was the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Pediatric 30 (Pedi 30) criteria for improvement. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used, and all patients were entered into an intent-to-treat analysis. Intraarticular corticosteroids (maximum of 2 in the initial 26 weeks) were allowed, but no new disease-modifying antirheumatic drug or change in nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug was allowed throughout the study. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 27 patients (63%) completed the initial 26-week study. Fourteen patients (52%) met the ACR Pedi 30 response criteria at week 26. Seventeen patients entered into the extension phase (13 who met response criteria and 4 who failed to meet response criteria but decided to continue). Nine of the 17 patients (53%) who entered the extension phase either completed all 30 months of study or the study ended prior to the month 30 visit. Five patients withdrew because of failure to maintain efficacy, 2 withdrew their consent, and 1 withdrew because of an adverse event. Using LOCF analysis, 65% of patients met ACR Pedi 30 response criteria at 1 year and 2 years (weeks 50 and 106, respectively) and 53% at the end of the study. Good response rates were also seen using ACR Pedi 50 and ACR Pedi 70 criteria (47% and 24% at week 106, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this open-label study of JRA patients who either failed to respond to, or were intolerant of, methotrexate, the majority met the ACR Pedi 30 response criteria at week 26. The response was durable, since 53% of patients who entered into the extension phase (maximum 30 months) responded at the end of this phase. Our findings support the further study of the role of leflunomide in the treatment of polyarticular-course JRA.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.339
Threshold uncertainty score0.774

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it