MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2035496830 · doi:10.1029/2011ja016457

Amplitudes of electron cyclotron waves transmitted in the ionosphere

2011· article· en· W2035496830 on OpenAlexaff
H. G. James

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsComputational physicsElectronElectric fieldCyclotronDipoleIonospherePlasmaMagnetic fieldAtomic physicsGeophysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[1] During the two-point sounding rocket experiment Observations of Electric-field Distributions in the Ionospheric Plasma–A Unique Strategy-C (OEDIPUS-C, hereinafter OC), Bernstein or electron cyclotron waves (ECWs) were transmitted over magnetic field-aligned emitter-receiver separations of hundreds of meters. Signals were observed at harmonic frequencies mfc of the electron cyclotron frequency fc, where m was 2, 3, and 4, fc ≈ 1.3 MHz, and the electron plasma frequency was less than half of fc. The electric fields at 2fc radiated by the emitting dipoles have been computed from the inhomogeneous Helmholtz wave equation. Using the full hot plasma theory to evaluate the dielectric tensor, a Green's function has been derived, based partly on numerical inversion and facilitated by some simplifications made possible by the given frequency and plasma parameters. Under the assumption of straight-line rays, it is found that the computed absolute voltage levels induced on the receiving dipoles are of the same order of magnitude as the observed levels. The electric field E radiation patterns at 2fc are found to be highly elongated along the direction of the Earth's magnetic induction field B. The component of E perpendicular to B, the radial or ρ component, is much stronger than the other two components in a cylindrical coordinate system. The prediction of strong radial E magnitudes along ray directions very close to B is consistent with the OC observations. These results enlarge our appreciation of distinct characteristics of ECW radiation and propagation that may improve understanding of the role of these electrostatic waves in ionospheric dynamics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres→Same topicIonosphere and magnetosphere dynamics→French-language works237,207→