Rossby Waves and the Variability of the North Pacific Current during 2002–03
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract A numerical model, the Parallel Ocean Program (POP), with 0.25° horizontal spatial resolution and 28 vertical levels is used to simulate the circulation of the North Pacific Ocean for the time period 1960–2006. Spectral nudging is used so that model drift of the mean state over the 46-yr time period of the simulation is prevented while allowing for the prognostic evolution of the circulation at time scales that are not nudged. The simulation successfully reproduces a southward shift in the North Pacific Current in 2002–03 as calculated from scalar observations. It is suggested that this calculated shift may not be solely due to meridional current drift but also a consequence of the shifting intensity of two eastward-moving current bands separated by 300–500 km, a distance consistent with the Rhines scale (the scale at which the 2D turbulence cascade tends to be arrested), which implies an influence from Rossby waves that are heavily affected by nonlinearities. The simulation suggests that the North Pacific Current may indeed have been influenced by a Rossby wave–like disturbance. This disturbance could have been forced to a significant extent by the local winds, but there is also evidence in the model for a coastally generated Rossby wave–like disturbance. This coastal disturbance was generated during the 1997/98 ENSO and traveled westward from the coast at about 1 cm s−1, taking 3–5 yr to travel into the region of the North Pacific Current. The noncoastal portion of the disturbance, which was generated by the local winds away from the coast, propagated westward at about 1 cm s−1 as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".