MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035530332 · doi:10.1504/ijmr.2009.022743

On-line monitoring of surface roughness in turning operations with opto-electrical transducer

2009· article· en· W2035530332 on OpenAlex
Avisekh Banerjee, Evgueni V. Bordatchev, S.K. Choudhury

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Manufacturing Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced machining processes and optimization
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransducerSurface roughnessSurface finishLine (geometry)AcousticsVibrationArtificial neural networkMechanical engineeringEngineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceArtificial intelligenceMathematicsPhysicsComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work studies the feasibility of on-line monitoring of surface roughness in turning operations using a developed opto-electrical transducer. Regression and Neural Network (NN) models are exploited to predict surface roughness and compared to actual and on-line measurements. The comparative study suggests feasibility of using the transducer within 15% tolerance. Pattern recognition analysis of on-line roughness and vibration displacements is used for reliable (>93%) classification of actual roughness. The results provide important information for the future development of on-line diagnostics and control of surface roughness in turning operation. [Received 4 January 2008; Revised 14 April 2008; Accepted 9 June 2008]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.362
Teacher spread0.328 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it