MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035540941 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.77.121403

Collective diffusion in two-dimensional systems: Exact results to establish limitations of the Reed-Ehrlich factorization

2008· article· en· W2035540941 on OpenAlexaff
S.H. Payne, H. J. Kreuzer

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review B · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFactorizationDiffusionThermal diffusivityStatistical physicsField (mathematics)PhysicsMatrix (chemical analysis)State (computer science)Quantum mechanicsMathematicsPure mathematicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using a gradient expansion, we derive an exact expression for the diffusivity in terms of correlation functions. The latter are calculated by transfer matrix methods generalized to an adsorbate with lateral interactions and subjected to an external field. It is shown that the Reed-Ehrlich factorization, commonly assumed, does not apply for generalized hopping kinetics where initial- and final-state interactions are involved, such as saddlepoint interactions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review BSame topicOpinion Dynamics and Social InfluenceFrench-language works237,207