MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035541779 · doi:10.1109/pvsc.2013.6745007

Optical absorption measurements in the wavelength range 1.3-1.6 microns in Bridgman CuInSe<inf>2</inf> grown from melts with added sodium

2013· article· en· W2035541779 on OpenAlexaff
An Qi Jin, C.H. Champness, H.F. Myers, I. Shih

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin Films
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStoichiometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Absorption (acoustics)SodiumAtmospheric temperature rangeMaterials scienceNuclear chemistryChemistryPhysical chemistryPhysicsChromatographyThermodynamicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Measurements of optical absorption coefficient (α) were made on Bridgman-grown CuInSe <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> samples, over the wavelength range 1300 to 1600 nm, at room temperature. The samples were obtained from multi-crystalline ingots, grown from melts of composition CuInSe <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2+x</inf> , plus y atomic % of elemental sodium. Here, x, the excess of Se over stoichiometry, ranged from 0 to 0.4 and y, the percentage of Na in the melt, ranged from 0 to 11 at %. It was found that α was considerably increased by the original Na in the melt and also by a stoichiometric deficiency of Se in the melt; that is with a melt formula corresponding to CuInSe <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">1.8</inf> , (or x = − 0.2). A smaller increase of α was observed with increase of x, the Se excess. With the addition of Na <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">2</inf> Se in the melt, little change was obtained compared with the large increase with elemental Na.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.653
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChalcogenide Semiconductor Thin FilmsFrench-language works237,207