Family system outcome following acquired brain injury: clinical and research perspectives
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To investigate family system outcome following acquired brain injury (ABI) using the Family Assessment Measure-III (FAM-III). RESEARCH DESIGN: Clients and families referred to the Family Support Service completed the FAM-III, a measure of family system functioning. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: Forty-three persons and 92 family members completed the FAM-III as part of intake. FAM-III scores were calculated and compared within the family, between subscales, and with established norms. RESULTS: FAM-III scores of the family member sample were significantly elevated compared to individuals with ABI and compared to the norm across all seven domains of family functioning. No significant relationship was found between family member relationship status or time post-injury and overall FAM-III scores. CONCLUSIONS: Family members identified distressed family functioning across all domains compared to survivors and compared to population norms. The FAM-III provides clinical utility in assessing family system functioning and shows promise as a family system outcome measure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.010 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it