Champ scientifique et image de l'ennemi: les interprétations de la nature du régime soviétique dans la soviétologie occidentale de 1950 à 1990 (Note)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'écroulement du système soviétique, après le coup d'État de 1991 a porté un coup fatal à la soviétologie. En fait, les soviétologues n'ayant prévu ni V événement ni son ampleur encore moins sa rapidité, il devint nécessaire de s'interroger sur les raisons d'un tel phénomène. Cet article est une contribution à cette préoccupation. Il enquête sur les principaux modèles interprétatifs appliqués à I'URSS de 1950 à 1990. À travers les différentes crises épistémologiques qu'il fait ressortir, il essaie de montrer que chacun de ces modèles s'inscrivait dans un contexte bien précis de la confrontation Est/ Ouest. C'est dire qu'il s'est agi d'un traitement scientifique de l'image de l'ennemi.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.020 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".