MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035553267 · doi:10.7202/704126ar

Champ scientifique et image de l'ennemi: les interprétations de la nature du régime soviétique dans la soviétologie occidentale de 1950 à 1990 (Note)

2005· article· fr· W2035553267 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Joseph Vincent Ntuda Ébodé

Bibliographic record

VenueÉtudes internationales · 2005
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'écroulement du système soviétique, après le coup d'État de 1991 a porté un coup fatal à la soviétologie. En fait, les soviétologues n'ayant prévu ni V événement ni son ampleur encore moins sa rapidité, il devint nécessaire de s'interroger sur les raisons d'un tel phénomène. Cet article est une contribution à cette préoccupation. Il enquête sur les principaux modèles interprétatifs appliqués à I'URSS de 1950 à 1990. À travers les différentes crises épistémologiques qu'il fait ressortir, il essaie de montrer que chacun de ces modèles s'inscrivait dans un contexte bien précis de la confrontation Est/ Ouest. C'est dire qu'il s'est agi d'un traitement scientifique de l'image de l'ennemi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.787
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.327
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉtudes internationalesSame topicHistorical Geopolitical and Social DynamicsFrench-language works237,207