The Troika: The Interlocking Roles of <i><scp>C</scp>ommission v. <scp>L</scp>uxembourg and <scp>B</scp>elgium</i>, <i><scp>V</scp>an <scp>G</scp>end en <scp>L</scp>oos</i> and <i><scp>C</scp>osta v. <scp>ENEL</scp></i> in the Creation of the <scp>E</scp>uropean Legal Order
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Through comparisons with dispute resolution procedures in the North American Free Trade Area's S ide A greements, and with the debate over the direct effect of W orld T rade O rganization obligations in the E uropean legal order, this paper demonstrates that three of the E uropean C ourt of J ustice's most important decisions—Commission v. Luxembourg and Belgium, Van Gend en Loos and Costa v. ENEL—should be understood as combining to reorganise general international law's relationship between the EU M ember S tates by substituting national court application of E uropean obligations for the use of interstate retaliation as an enforcement mechanism, and thus providing the foundations for the EU 's distinctive legal order.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.016 | 0.033 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it