Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Following a brief introduction to current problems and concerns with regard to international human rights, this essay is structured around three overlapping themes: 1) the right to participate in sports; 2) the achievement of human rights through sport; and 3) sport and the human rights of specific classes of persons. The first considers various charters declaring the right to participate in sport, and the widespread endorsement of these charters by nations around the world; and points to the ways in which such rights have either not been addressed, or have often been addressed in ways that are neo-colonialist, leading, for example, to the loss of aboriginal cultures, or to the establishment of systems of sport that emphasize the development of high performance athletes rather than broad-based participation. The second points out that the only major human rights victory that may be attributed, at least in part, to sport is that of the anti-apartheid movement. The third combines the right to participate with the achievement of human rights through sport by considering the various ways that sport has been involved in the achievement of human rights by specific classes of persons (women, persons with a disability, aboriginal people, etc.). The essay concludes with a consideration of international foreign policy initiatives, and the ways in which they have, and could, further human rights in and through sports; briefly considers the place of sport in achieving the Millennium Development Goals; and argues that the status of children should be the next major international foreign policy initiative in sport.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it