MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035610240 · doi:10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.020

Study of stem cell function using microarray experiments

2005· review· en· W2035610240 on OpenAlexaff
Carolina Perez‐Iratxeta, Gareth Palidwor, Christopher J. Porter, Neal A. Sanche, Matthew R. Huska, Brian P Suomela, Enrique M. Muro, Paul M. Krzyzanowski, E.J. Hughes, P A Campbell, Michael A. Rudnicki, Miguel A. Andrade‐Navarro

Bibliographic record

VenueFEBS Letters · 2005
Typereview
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGene expression and cancer classification
Canadian institutionsOntario Genomics
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicroarrayDNA microarrayStem cellMicroarray databasesComputational biologyMicroarray analysis techniquesBiologyFunction (biology)Molecular biologyCell biologyGeneGene expressionGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

DNA Microarrays are used to simultaneously measure the levels of thousands of mRNAs in a sample. We illustrate here that a collection of such measurements in different cell types and states is a sound source of functional predictions, provided the microarray experiments are analogous and the cell samples are appropriately diverse. We have used this approach to study stem cells, whose identity and mechanisms of control are not well understood, generating Affymetrix microarray data from more than 200 samples, including stem cells and their derivatives, from human and mouse. The data can be accessed online (StemBase; http://www.scgp.ca:8080/StemBase/).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.982
Threshold uncertainty score0.847

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.074
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations74
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFEBS LettersSame topicGene expression and cancer classificationFrench-language works237,207