Age at menopause, and knowledge of and attitudes to menopause, of women in Karachi, Pakistan
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to identify the average age at menopause in Karachi and to assess knowledge of and attitudes to the menopause among Pakistani women in different social strata. STUDY DESIGN: A population-based cross-sectional study of 960 women aged over 35 years was conducted. RESULTS: As insufficient data were available for 35 women, 925 interviews were analysed. There were 287 menopausal women, whose mean (SD) age at menopause was 47.1 (4.7) years (95% CI 46.8 to 47.6). Of these 287 women, 135 (47%) wanted their menses to continue and 235 (82%) had consulted a physician after the menopause. Of all 925 women, 58% knew the correct definition of the menopause, all had consulted a physician for various symptoms related to the menopause and 53% said that women should consult a physician premenopausally. Symptoms experienced by premenopausal women included lack of sleep (25%), fear of infertility (13%) and urinary incontinence (18%). The majority of the overall sample (52%) were sexually active. Of the sexually active women, 16% had marital problems, compared with 44% of sexually inactive women, and this difference was statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Source of knowledge about the menopause included relatives (35%), television (18%), neighbours (17%), friends (17%) and health-care providers (14%). CONCLUSIONS: Evidence-based information about the menopause should be provided for Pakistani women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".