Sighs and Their Relationship to Apnea in the Newborn Infant
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To test the hypothesis that sighs are mechanistically important in triggering apnea, we studied 10 preterm infants, group 1: body weight 1.8 +/- 0.1 kg, gestational age 33 +/- 1 weeks, postnatal age 21 +/- 4 days, and 10 term infants, group 2: body weight 3.9 +/- 0.15 kg, gestational age 40 +/- 0.4 weeks, postnatal age 1.4 +/- 0.2 days. Instantaneous ventilatory changes associated with a sigh were studied in another 10 preterm infants, group 3: body weight 1.6 +/- 0.11 kg, gestational age 32 +/- 0.4 weeks, postnatal age 25 +/- 4 days. Ventilation was measured using a nosepiece and a flow-through system. Sleep states were recorded. Sighs were more frequent in preterm than in term infants (0.4 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.18 +/- 0.03 sighs/min; p = 0.03) and in rapid eye movement than in quiet sleep (0.5 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.3 +/- 0.05 sighs/min; p = 0.05). Of 722 apneas, 235 (33%) were associated with a sigh; of these, 113 (48%) preceded and 122 (52%) followed a sigh. Sighs induced with airway occlusion (groups 1 and 2) were more frequent after occlusion on 21 than on 35% O2, particularly when O2 saturation was low and negative airway pressure high. Instantaneous ventilation measured over 10 breaths preceding a sigh did not show any trend indicating the possible appearance of a sigh. Tidal volume increased from 7.5 +/- 0.7 before the sigh to 18.9 +/- 0.7 ml/kg (p < 0.01) during a sigh, with a significant increase in inspiratory drive. Ventilation increased from 0.327 +/- 0.041 to 0.660 +/- 0.073 l/min/kg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".