MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Timing, magnitude, and location of initial soluble aluminum injuries to Mungbean roots

2004· article· en· W2035626882 on OpenAlex
F. P. C. Blarney, Naoko K. Nishizawa, Etsuro Yoshimura

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSoil Science & Plant Nutrition · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAluminum toxicity and tolerance in plants and animals
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAlberta Innovates - Health Solutions
KeywordsElongationHorticultureChemistryRadiataVignaAluminiumCytoplasmGrowth rateBotanyBiophysicsBiologyBiochemistryUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Despite a century's knowledge that soluble aluminum (Al) is associated with acid soils and poor plant growth, it is still uncertain how Al exerts its deleterious effects. Hypotheses include reactions of Al with components of the cell wall, plasmalemma, or cytoplasm of cells close to the root tip, thereby reducing cell expansion and root growth. Digital micros copy was used to determine the initial injuries of soluble Al to mungbean (Vigna radiata L) roots Roots of young seedlings were marked with activated carbon particles and grown in 1 mM CaCl2 solution at pH 6 for ca. 100 min (control period), and AICl3 solution was added to ensure a final concentration of 50 µM Al (pH 4). Further studies were conducted on the effects of pH 4 with and without 50 iM Al Four distinct, but possibly related, initial detrimental effects of soluble Al were noted First, there was a 56–75% reduction in the root elongation rate, first evident 18–52 min after the addition of Al, root elongation continuing at a decreased rate for ca. 20 h. Decreasing solution pH from 6 to 4 increased the root elongation rate 4-fold after 5 min, which decreased to close to the original rate after 130 min. The addition of Al during the period of rapid growth at pH 4 reduced the root elongation rate by 71% 14 min after the addition of Al The activated carbon marks on the roots showed that, during the control period, the zone of maximum root growth occurred at 2,200–5,100 im from the root tip (i.e the cell elongation zone) It was there that Al first exerted its detrimental effect and low pH increased root elongation Second, soluble Al pre vented the progress of cells from the transition to the elongation phase, resulting in a considerable reduction of root growth over the longer term. The third type of soluble Al injury occurred after exposure for ca. 4 h to 50 µM Al when a kink developed at 2,370 im from the root tip. Fourth, ruptures of the root epidermal and cortical cells at 1,900–2,300 im from the tip occurred ≥4.3 h after exposure to soluble Al The timing and location of Al injuries support the contention that Al initially reduces cell elongation, thus decreasing root growth and causing damage to epidermal and cortical cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.363
Threshold uncertainty score0.297

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it