MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035657486 · doi:10.1002/mop.21871

3D FDTD method for arbitrary anisotropic materials

2006· article· en· W2035657486 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrowave and Optical Technology Letters · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite-difference time-domain methodAnisotropyFerrite (magnet)MicrowaveMicrostripMaterials scienceElectromagnetic simulationPhysicsElectronic engineeringOpticsEngineeringComposite materialTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A generalized 3D finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) method for the modeling of electromagnetic wave interaction with a full anisotropic media is presented. The proposed formulation is applied to three configurations: a microstrip patch antenna with anisotropic substrates, weakly magnetic ferrite absorbers with punctured holes, and a waveguide loaded with heterogeneous anisotropic magnetic materials. Computed results show that anisotropic material can have great effects on system properties and can add another degree of design freedom. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microwave Opt Technol Lett 48: 2083–2090, 2006; Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI 10.1002/mop.21871

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.220
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it