Effect of Bombesin on the Development of the Neonatal Rabbit Gastrointestinal Tract
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of bombesin on the postnatal development of the gastrointestinal tract was examined in New Zealand white rabbits. Bombesin (1.25, 12.5, 30 micrograms/kg body weight) or vehicle was administered intraperitoneally to suckling rabbits for 13 days starting on day 4 of life. The animals were killed at day 17. There was no significant effect of bombesin at doses of 1.25 or 12.5 micrograms/kg in any region of the gut studied. Bombesin administered at 30 micrograms/kg induced a widespread trophic effect in the gastrointestinal tract characterized by significant increases in the wet weight of the stomach, liver and whole small intestine, as well as in 10-cm segments of the proximal, middle, and distal small intestine. There was also a significant increase in the mucosal weight of 10-cm segments of the proximal, middle and distal small intestine, and the colon in the bombesin-treated group. Bombesin significantly increased the protein and DNA contents of the liver, the fundus of stomach, all segments of the small intestine and the distal colon. Maximal stimulation was seen in DNA content, suggesting that bombesin has a primarily hyperplastic effect. Bombesin increased the activities of small intestinal sucrase and maltase but not lactase. Bombesin did not alter hepatic glucokinase activity. These findings suggest that bombesin can promote the growth of the neonatal rabbit gastrointestinal tract and liver.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".