Oxygen Transfer Reactions. 4. Reaction of High Valent Oxoruthenium Compounds with Sulfides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The oxidation of methoxy substituted benzyl phenyl sulfides can be used to distinguish between oxidants that react by single electron transfer (followed by oxygen rebound) and those which react by direct oxygen atom transfer in a two-electron process. Transfer of a single electron results in the formation of an intermediate radical cation, which can undergo C-S bond cleavage and deprotonation reactions leading to the formation of methoxy substituted benzyl derivatives, methoxy substituted benzaldehydes, and diphenyl disulfide. The oxidation of 4-methoxybenzyl phenyl sulfide and 3,4,5-trimethoxybenzyl phenyl sulfide by oxidants known to participate in single electron transfers (Ce(4+), Mn(3+), and Cr(6+)) results in the formation of the corresponding benzaldehydes, benzyl alcohols, benzyl acetates, and benzyl nitrates in variable yields. However, the only products obtained from the oxidation of the same compounds with RuO(4), RuO(4-), and RuO(4)(2-) are sulfoxides and sulfones. Therefore, it is concluded that the oxidation of sulfides by oxoruthenium compounds likely proceeds by a concerted mechanism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".