Le don de soi. La valeur des tableaux dans les testaments épiscopaux français (fin XVII e –fin XVIII e siècle)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although paintings are often seen as part of material culture, the wills of 18th-century bishops have reserved a special fate for certain works. The singular aspect of these works resides in their ability to embody an aspect of the donor. Focusing on this singularization process (by the way the paintings are depicted or exhibited or by the stories they convey) allows us to understand how these images build and strengthen links of affection or service. The way the various values associated with paintings interact and play out depending on the recipient reflects the perceived equivalence in the bishop’s mind between the value of a gift and the value of the recipient, and serves to intermingle related material, affective, and social aspects. The aim of this study is to identify the conditions contributing to the singularization of objects and their involvement in affective links. It is also intended to contribute to the history of the value of art, with less emphasis on the ontological than on the historical and social.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it