MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035689701 · doi:10.1115/1.4028873

Trapped Unburned Fuel Estimation and Robustness Analysis for a Turbocharged Diesel Engine With Negative Valve Overlap Strategy

2014· article· en· W2035689701 on OpenAlexaff
Chen Song, Fengjun Yan

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicAdvanced Combustion Engine Technologies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCombustionRobustness (evolution)Control theory (sociology)ResidualExhaust gas recirculationMean squared errorTurbochargerKalman filterDiesel fuelAutomotive engineeringMechanicsMaterials scienceMathematicsInternal combustion engineComputer scienceEngineeringChemistryAlgorithmThermodynamicsPhysicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Turbocharger and negative valve overlap (NVO) strategy are widely used among advanced combustion modes for internal combustion engines. In order to achieve well emission performance, the NVO can be as large as 100 crank angle (CA) degrees, such that the residual gas fraction can be up to 40%. With such amount of residual gas in the cylinder, the trapped unburned fuel is not trivial. It has a significant impact on the combustion process. However, the trapped unburned fuel mass is hard to be measured directly. In this paper, a novel method based on the signals of oxygen fraction is proposed to estimate it. By analyzing the combustion process, dynamic equations for the intake/exhaust manifolds and in-cylinder oxygen fractions, as well as actual fuel mass in the cylinder are constructed. A smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) was designed to estimate oxygen fractions and further the trapped unburned fuel. As a comparison, Kalman filter (KF) and linear matrix inequality (LMI) based linear parameter-varying (LPV) filter were also applied. Robustness properties of the three observers are analyzed based on the theory of input-to-state (ISS) stability. The proposed models and methods and theoretical analysis are validated and compared through a set of simulations in high-fidelity GT-Power environment. The simulation results match well with theoretical analysis that the SVSF has good properties of strong robustness (with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.24, comparing with 0.4 of LPV filter and 0.49 of KF, for the unburned fuel estimation).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.651

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Dynamic Systems Measurement and ControlSame topicAdvanced Combustion Engine TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207