Trapped Unburned Fuel Estimation and Robustness Analysis for a Turbocharged Diesel Engine With Negative Valve Overlap Strategy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Turbocharger and negative valve overlap (NVO) strategy are widely used among advanced combustion modes for internal combustion engines. In order to achieve well emission performance, the NVO can be as large as 100 crank angle (CA) degrees, such that the residual gas fraction can be up to 40%. With such amount of residual gas in the cylinder, the trapped unburned fuel is not trivial. It has a significant impact on the combustion process. However, the trapped unburned fuel mass is hard to be measured directly. In this paper, a novel method based on the signals of oxygen fraction is proposed to estimate it. By analyzing the combustion process, dynamic equations for the intake/exhaust manifolds and in-cylinder oxygen fractions, as well as actual fuel mass in the cylinder are constructed. A smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) was designed to estimate oxygen fractions and further the trapped unburned fuel. As a comparison, Kalman filter (KF) and linear matrix inequality (LMI) based linear parameter-varying (LPV) filter were also applied. Robustness properties of the three observers are analyzed based on the theory of input-to-state (ISS) stability. The proposed models and methods and theoretical analysis are validated and compared through a set of simulations in high-fidelity GT-Power environment. The simulation results match well with theoretical analysis that the SVSF has good properties of strong robustness (with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.24, comparing with 0.4 of LPV filter and 0.49 of KF, for the unburned fuel estimation).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".