Immunoallergic Drug-Induced Liver Injury in Humans
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
No conclusive data exist that define the mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug-induced liver injury (DILI) in humans; therefore, we are forced to speculate based on their clinical characteristics. The major characteristics are most easily explained by an immune mechanism. Many cases of idiosyncratic DILI tend to have a longer delay in onset and sometimes do not occur rapidly on rechallenge. These instances of DILI have been attributed to metabolic idiosyncrasy. However, these characteristics may also reflect an autoimmune mechanism, and most drugs that cause idiosyncratic DILI are also associated with various types of other autoimmune reactions. A characteristic feature of the immune system is that different individuals respond differently to the same immunogen. In some cases, a drug can induce an immune response to a reactive metabolite acting as a hapten; in others, the response is against a native protein, which leads to an autoimmune reaction. This is likely responsible for the interindividual differences in susceptibility and outcome noted in human DILI.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it