MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035726647 · doi:10.1215/00182168-85-1-140

Cartagena de Indias y la región histórica del Caribe, 1580–1640

2005· article· es· W2035726647 on OpenAlexaff
Daviken Studnicki-Gizbert

Bibliographic record

VenueHispanic American Historical Review · 2005
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCuban History and Society
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCounterpointColonialismHistoriographyPort (circuit theory)HumanitiesLatin AmericansHistoryEthnologyGeographyPolitical scienceSociologyArtArchaeologyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In the early seventeenth century, Cartagena de Indias was—with Havana and Veracruz— one of the three major hubs of the Spanish Caribbean’s commercial system. Despite this importance, the port city has received surprisingly little in the way of serious and sustained attention by colonialists—until now. Antonino Vidal Ortega’s study of Cartagena de Indias not only provides a thorough reconstitution of the city’s commercial and social life but also handily illustrates how these activities fit into the early economic development of the Caribbean basin. In this last respect, Vidal Ortega’s work can profitably be read alongside studies by Alejandro de la Fuente and Carmen López Yuste on Havana and Veracruz. Together they provide a long-needed, specifically Caribbean counterpoint to the historiography on internal colonial markets pioneered by Carlos Sempat Assadourian and Juan Carlos Caravaglia.Vidal Ortega’s writing is clear, and he logically divides the book into thematic units covering the early history of the city, its place within the Spanish Atlantic and Caribbean trading systems, its ties to its hinterland in the Nuevo Reino de Granada, and, finally, its patterns of urban social and cultural life. Within this classic frame lays a wonderfully detailed and rewarding account of a vibrant Caribbean port. The author has mined long runs of previously neglected legajos s in the Archivo General de Indias and relevant local archives. The results of his labors shine through.Readers will encounter here a multiracial, even cosmopolitan, port. In 1619 an estimated 20,000 Africans and Afro-Caribbeans lived in the city and its environs, making it one of the most African cities of the Spanish colonies. They shared the city with urbanized Amerindians, mestizos, mulattoes, a sizeable group of foreigners (including a Pole, a Scotsman, and a former “resident of Tangiers”), as well as representatives of the various nations of the Iberian Peninsula. The city lived to trade, and Vidal Ortega does a fine job of describing the different sites and practices of all this trafficking. Of particular note is his depiction of the extramural barrio of Getsemaní, a dense maze of houses, stockades, and dead-end alleys uniquely suitable for illicit dealing. Informal exchange proved to be the norm in Cartagena. This led to the development of what the author terms a “burlesque” civic culture of dissimulation and even parody. Individuals of all groups and conditions participated, but few could rival the Portuguese, who simultaneously dominated the port’s contraband trade and took up leading positions within its public institutions.Vidal Ortega extends his study to the city’s hinterlands. This move allows him to incorporate wonderful material on frontier life, marronage, the development of mines and plantations, and the conduct of contraband in the outports of the Venezuelan coast. It is worth noting the book’s ability to shift smoothly between social and economic phenomena and to show how each affected the other.Descriptively rich as it is, the book’s principal contribution is in situating Cartagena within a broader context of regional economic development. The port has traditionally been portrayed as the American terminus of the southerly leg of the Spanish transatlantic commercial system. Vidal Ortega shows that this was but one of Cartagena’s many commercial roles. Following upon the work of Enriqueta Vila Vilar, he offers a detailed account of the direct trade of slaves from Africa to, and through, the city. More important, perhaps, is his careful demonstration of Cartagena’s connections to the expanding hinterlands of the Venezuelan coast and the gold fields of Nueva Granada, to the viceroyalties of Peru and New Spain, and to the various islands of the Caribbean. Vidal Ortega’s evidence clearly shows that the majority of Cartagena’s trade flowed through regional and intercolonial circuits.Vida Ortega argues that Cartagena de Indias exercised a “hegemonic” role in the burgeoning Caribbean system of the seventeenth century. Here it is possible to voice some reservations. The book’s focus upon a single market makes it difficult to establish, with precision and evidence, Cartagena’s relative weight within the overall Caribbean economy. To substantiate this claim, data from the different trading centers of the region, both Spanish and non-Spanish, must be brought together. Still, Vidal Ortega has provided us with a key piece of this puzzle, and an artfully crafted one at that.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.311
Teacher spread0.289 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHispanic American Historical ReviewSame topicCuban History and SocietyFrench-language works237,207