Development of a FPGA Based Real-Time Power Analysis and Control for Distributed Generation Interface
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Energy coming from renewable sources has become very important nowadays, mainly because of their negligible contribution to greenhouse gas generation. A problem that then arises is how to integrate these new sources into a traditional power grid, in such a manner as to maximize the efficiency and reliability of this new distributed generation (DG) system. The hardware to do that is generally a voltage source inverter (VSI) that supplies a common load, as in single-phase residential and commercial applications. The optimizing process requires, of course, the usual power analysis. This paper presents the development and the experimental evaluation of a power control system for a single-phase grid-connected VSI including the power analysis using as processor for the control implementation a field-programmable gate array (FPGA) circuit. New hardware structures of adaptive linear neural networks (ADALINE) allow the implementation of power control algorithms and have also permitted the real-time analysis of the high-order harmonics without increasing the implementation area of the FPGA circuit. These features are ideal for novel DG power electronics interfaces that could be used not only for active power dispatch but also for harmonics and reactive power compensation. Simulation and experimental results of the proposed fixed and variable frequency schemes are included to confirm their validity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".