MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035748496 · doi:10.5539/mas.v3n6p38

Study on Economic, Rapid and Environmental Power Dispatch Based on Fuzzy Multi-objective Optimization

2009· article· en· W2035748496 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lubing Xie, Songling Wang, WU Zhi-quan

Bibliographic record

VenueModern Applied Science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric Power System Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomic dispatchComputer scienceMathematical optimizationFuzzy logicMATLABProcess (computing)Power system simulationDynamic programmingLinear programmingUnit (ring theory)Electric power systemOperations researchPower (physics)EngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Environmental awareness and the recent environmental protecting policies have extremely spurred many electric utilities to regulate their practices to account for the emission impacts. One way to accomplish this is by reformulating the traditional Economic Load Dispatch (ELD) module merely with a view to minimal coal consumption of fossil fired units. This paper presents a triple-objective ELD model which consists of the minimal coal consumption, the best time for the unit commitment response and the economic emission index. The rapid/economic/environmental dispatch problem is a multi-objective non-linear optimization problem with constraints. The fuzzy theory is adopted to convert the multi-objective problem into the single-objective problem. The problem is been tackled through dynamic programming algorithm and the approach is tested on a four-unit system to illustrate the analysis process in present analysis. Results simulated through MATLAB show that the approach has great potential in handling multi-objective optimization problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueModern Applied ScienceSame topicElectric Power System OptimizationFrench-language works237,207