MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035755968 · doi:10.1055/s-2007-986440

Pituitary Adenoma Associated with Intraventricular Meningioma: Case Report

2007· article· en· W2035755968 on OpenAlexaff
Leodante da Costa, Jay Riva-Cambrin, Asheesh Tandon, Michael Tymianski

Bibliographic record

VenueSkull base · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMeningioma and schwannoma management
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePituitary adenomaMeningiomaFourth ventricleResectionAdenomaThird ventricleVentricleRadiologyInternal medicineSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

See also: Commentary [Pituitary Adenoma Associated with Intraventricular Meningioma: Case Report] Skull Base 2007; 17(05): 351-351 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986442 See also: Commentary [Pituitary Adenoma Associated with Intraventricular Meningioma: Case Report] Skull Base 2007; 17(05): 351-351 DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-986441 ABSTRACT Although rare, the association of intracranial meningiomas and pituitary adenomas has been reported. Intraventricular meningiomas are unusual, and meningiomas located in the fourth ventricle are even more so. We report a patient who harbored a prolactin-secreting pituitary adenoma and a fourth ventricle meningioma who was treated with surgical resection of the latter and medical treatment for the former. To our knowledge, this is the first report of such an unusual association. KEYWORDS Intraventricular tumor - meningioma - pituitary tumor - prolactinoma

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0020.003
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSkull baseSame topicMeningioma and schwannoma managementFrench-language works237,207