MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Folk housing revisited

2014· article· en· W2035770873 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeographical Review · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVernacularContext (archaeology)Meaning (existential)WoodlandGeographyCultural landscapeSociologyVernacular cultureSocial scienceHistoryEcologyArchaeologyEpistemologyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstractAs Fred Kniffen observed, vernacular buildings identify culture and record our relationships with physical and social environment. Influenced by Kniffen, twentieth‐century cultural geographers used spatially correlated log homebuilding attributes as diagnostics. The present study used a qualitative meta‐study approach to evaluate studies citing such correlations in the eastern temperate forests of North America. Forty‐two studies involving sixty‐three geographic entities and twenty‐two attribute types were evaluated. The meta‐study's findings were consistent with an Eastern Woodlands regional model described by Kniffen, Terry Jordan, and Wilbur Zelinsky. A majority of the spatially correlated attributes involved building materials, cited cultural and/or environmental influences to explain their findings, and cited correlations at state/province or county scales. Today, identification of building culture undoubtedly continues to offer potential guidance to sustainability efforts, and, although untapped, vernacular building continues to offer potential as a key diagnostic.Keywords:: cultural geographyqualitative meta‐studyvernacular architecturebuilding culturesustainability Notes1. Except in the context of bringing the concept of discussing actor‐network theory (ANT), the meaning of “culture” in this paper is the traditional one: culture as a thing, not a process. This is the meaning of “culture” as used in the works analyzed by the meta‐study.2. Presumably, by failing to investigate the cultural and ecological contexts associated with building attributes.3. See Davis (1999) for a broad discussion of “building culture.”4. Except in New England, areas settled by New Englanders, and the Southern Coastal Plain, log was the preferred early European homebuilding method. Even as late as the early twentieth century, log was the predominant homebuilding method in areas where sawmills had not been established.5. Notable for the absence of log structures.6. Keywords included meta‐analysis, meta‐study, research synthesis, systematic review, and literature review combined with geography and vernacular architecture. Databases included EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier, Google Scholar, Informaworld Taylor & Francis Group Current Collection, JSTOR, and Wiley Interscience. Individual publications included Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Area, The Geographical Journal, Historical Geography, Journal of Cultural Geography, Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, Professional Geographer, Progress in Human Geography, Progress in Physical Geography, and Vernacular Architecture.7. Only one geographic application of the qualitative meta‐study method was identified (Glasmeier and Farrigan 2005).8. Keywords included “log,” “log house,” “log cabin,” “log structure,” and “log building” combined with “geography,” “architecture,” “vernacular architecture,” and “folk architecture.” Databases included EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier, Google, Google Scholar, Informaworld Taylor & Francis Group Current Collection, JSTOR, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, USDA Forest Service publications and Wiley Interscience. Individual publications included Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology, Canadian Geographer, Canadian Geographical Journal, The Geographical Journal, Geographical Review, Historical Geography, Journal of Cultural Geography, The Journal of Geography, Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, Professional Geographer, Progress in Human Geography, Vernacular Architecture, and Winterthur Portfolio.9. For detailed about data‐collection instrument and examples, please contact the first author.10. For examinations of North American log‐building attributes and typologies, see Kniffen and Glassie (1966), Jordan (1985), and Wilson (1984).11. Native American log building has evolved both separately and within European traditions.12. Interestingly, the referenced study of contemporary log‐home manufacturing also found that combinations of tree species, log type, log profile, corner notch, and log‐home production volume were shown to successfully predict manufacturer perspectives on their forest resources.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJames S. PetersDr. Peters recently completed his doctorate in forestry in the environmental conservation department at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003; [jspeters@eco.umass.edu]David T. DameryDr. Damery is an associate professor, [ddamery@eco.umass.edu].Richard W. WilkieDr. Wilkie is a professor emeritus in the department of geosciences at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003; [wilkie.richard@gmail.com].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.947
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it