MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2035770873 · doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2014.12046.x

Folk housing revisited

2014· article· en· W2035770873 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueGeographical Review · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVernacularContext (archaeology)Meaning (existential)WoodlandGeographyCultural landscapeSociologyVernacular cultureSocial scienceHistoryEcologyArchaeologyEpistemologyLinguistics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

AbstractAs Fred Kniffen observed, vernacular buildings identify culture and record our relationships with physical and social environment. Influenced by Kniffen, twentieth‐century cultural geographers used spatially correlated log homebuilding attributes as diagnostics. The present study used a qualitative meta‐study approach to evaluate studies citing such correlations in the eastern temperate forests of North America. Forty‐two studies involving sixty‐three geographic entities and twenty‐two attribute types were evaluated. The meta‐study's findings were consistent with an Eastern Woodlands regional model described by Kniffen, Terry Jordan, and Wilbur Zelinsky. A majority of the spatially correlated attributes involved building materials, cited cultural and/or environmental influences to explain their findings, and cited correlations at state/province or county scales. Today, identification of building culture undoubtedly continues to offer potential guidance to sustainability efforts, and, although untapped, vernacular building continues to offer potential as a key diagnostic.Keywords:: cultural geographyqualitative meta‐studyvernacular architecturebuilding culturesustainability Notes1. Except in the context of bringing the concept of discussing actor‐network theory (ANT), the meaning of “culture” in this paper is the traditional one: culture as a thing, not a process. This is the meaning of “culture” as used in the works analyzed by the meta‐study.2. Presumably, by failing to investigate the cultural and ecological contexts associated with building attributes.3. See Davis (1999) for a broad discussion of “building culture.”4. Except in New England, areas settled by New Englanders, and the Southern Coastal Plain, log was the preferred early European homebuilding method. Even as late as the early twentieth century, log was the predominant homebuilding method in areas where sawmills had not been established.5. Notable for the absence of log structures.6. Keywords included meta‐analysis, meta‐study, research synthesis, systematic review, and literature review combined with geography and vernacular architecture. Databases included EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier, Google Scholar, Informaworld Taylor & Francis Group Current Collection, JSTOR, and Wiley Interscience. Individual publications included Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Area, The Geographical Journal, Historical Geography, Journal of Cultural Geography, Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, Professional Geographer, Progress in Human Geography, Progress in Physical Geography, and Vernacular Architecture.7. Only one geographic application of the qualitative meta‐study method was identified (Glasmeier and Farrigan 2005).8. Keywords included “log,” “log house,” “log cabin,” “log structure,” and “log building” combined with “geography,” “architecture,” “vernacular architecture,” and “folk architecture.” Databases included EBSCOhost Academic Search Premier, Google, Google Scholar, Informaworld Taylor & Francis Group Current Collection, JSTOR, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, USDA Forest Service publications and Wiley Interscience. Individual publications included Annals of the Association of American Geographers, Bulletin of the Association for Preservation Technology, Canadian Geographer, Canadian Geographical Journal, The Geographical Journal, Geographical Review, Historical Geography, Journal of Cultural Geography, The Journal of Geography, Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture, Professional Geographer, Progress in Human Geography, Vernacular Architecture, and Winterthur Portfolio.9. For detailed about data‐collection instrument and examples, please contact the first author.10. For examinations of North American log‐building attributes and typologies, see Kniffen and Glassie (1966), Jordan (1985), and Wilson (1984).11. Native American log building has evolved both separately and within European traditions.12. Interestingly, the referenced study of contemporary log‐home manufacturing also found that combinations of tree species, log type, log profile, corner notch, and log‐home production volume were shown to successfully predict manufacturer perspectives on their forest resources.Additional informationNotes on contributorsJames S. PetersDr. Peters recently completed his doctorate in forestry in the environmental conservation department at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003; [jspeters@eco.umass.edu]David T. DameryDr. Damery is an associate professor, [ddamery@eco.umass.edu].Richard W. WilkieDr. Wilkie is a professor emeritus in the department of geosciences at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, 01003; [wilkie.richard@gmail.com].

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,947
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,997

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,076
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,181 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle