An experimental procedure for identifying the aerobic-phase biological source of nitrous oxide in anoxic–aerobic wastewater treatment systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a relatively simple experimental procedure used to assess the relative contribution of autotrophic and heterotrophic organisms in the generation of aerobic-phase nitrous oxide from a mixed microbial population in a bench-scale, anoxic–aerobic, sequencing batch reactor (SBR) wastewater treatment system. The procedure eliminated ammonia oxidation from a "perturbation" cycle, while maintaining pH and dissolved oxygen levels similar to the "baseline" cycle. Nitrite and carbon oxidation were maintained during the perturbation cycle. Compared to more complex methods such as stable isotope labelling techniques, the described procedure is logistically simple and requires equipment readily available in most environmental engineering laboratories. When applied to an SBR system treating synthetic wastewater (influent ammonia N concentration = 160 mg/L), the experimental results strongly suggest that essentially all of the nitrous oxide produced during the aerobic phase of the cycle was generated by autotrophic, ammonia oxidizing organisms. Little, if any, nitrous oxide appeared to be generated by heterotrophic denitrification during the aerobic phase of the cycle. Key words: nitrification, aerobic denitrification, nitrous oxide, nitrite reduction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".