MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035790115 · doi:10.1109/wacvw.2015.9

Evolutionary Computational Methods for Optimizing the Classification of Sea Stars in Underwater Images

2015· article· en· W2035790115 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersMitacs
KeywordsComputer scienceUnderwaterArtificial intelligenceProcess (computing)Sampling (signal processing)StarsContextual image classificationPattern recognition (psychology)Machine learningComputer visionData miningImage (mathematics)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using video and imagery for assessing the distribution and abundance of marine organisms is a valuable sampling method in that it is non-invasive and permits large volumes of data to be acquired. Quickly and accurately processing large volumes of imagery is a challenge for human analysts, which motivates the need for automated processing methods. In this paper, we present a method for the automatic classification of sea stars in underwater images. The method uses a very small number of features and is efficient. The classification process is optimized by using evolutionary computational methods. Experimental results show excellent performance of our proposed optimized classification approach.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.445
Threshold uncertainty score0.273

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207