MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035809214 · doi:10.1109/aim.2014.6878169

A low power electronics converter with input resistance control for piezoelectric energy harvesting

2014· article· en· W2035809214 on OpenAlexaff
S. Faghihi, Mehrdad Moallem

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicInnovative Energy Harvesting Technologies
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnergy harvestingPower electronicsElectrical engineeringRectifier (neural networks)Battery (electricity)Boost converterElectronic engineeringImpedance matchingOutput impedanceEngineeringBuck converterPower (physics)VoltageComputer scienceElectrical impedancePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work describes the modeling and analysis of a low power electronics converter for piezoelectric energy harvesting. The proposed converter consists of a diode bridge rectifier, a MOSFET switch driven by a PWM signal, and a rechargeable battery as the storage device. The circuit is used to convert mechanical vibration energy into electric charge stored in a battery using piezoelectric transducers mounted on a flexible structure. By utilizing an averaging scheme, it is shown that the converter exhibits a pseudo-resistive behavior across its input terminals. An analytical expression for the input resistance of the converter is derived and further evaluated by simulations and experiments. A self-powered converter is utilized to convert vibration energy into electric charge whose input resistance can be set to a prescribed value depending on the input source resistance. It is also shown that by applying a feedback controller to the circuit, the input resistance of the converter can be regulated to a desired value. This feature may be utilized to achieve impedance matching in applications requiring maximum power transfer. Experimental studies are conducted to verify the performance of the self-powered circuit and the feedback control scheme.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.961
Threshold uncertainty score0.889

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.176
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicInnovative Energy Harvesting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207