MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035818899 · doi:10.1159/000284866

Localization and Lateralization in the Delusion of Substitution

2010· review· en· W2035818899 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Stephen F. Signer

Bibliographic record

VenuePsychopathology · 2010
Typereview
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicBody Image and Dysmorphia Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMedical Research Council Canada
KeywordsDelusionLateralization of brain functionPsychologySubstitution (logic)Cognitive psychologyDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatryLinguisticsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Five hundred and seventy cases in 252 reports of the delusion of substitution yielded 200 cases with an organic contributor to the occurrence of the delusion. In 79 cases lateralization or localization could be determined, with lesions primarily in the left temporal or right frontal areas. Factors related to 'feature recognition', 'familiarity' and 'reduplication' could be found and are discussed in relation to the neurobehavioral features of the symptom.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.393
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePsychopathologySame topicBody Image and Dysmorphia StudiesFrench-language works237,207