Insertion of the Membrane-proximal Region of the Neuronal SNARE Coiled Coil into the Membrane
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the neuron, soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive factor attachment protein receptor (SNARE) proteins assemble into an alpha-helical coiled coil that bridges the synaptic vesicle to the plasma membrane and drives membrane fusion, a required process for neurotransmitter release at the nerve terminal. How does coiled coil formation drive membrane fusion? To investigate the structural and energetic coupling between the coiled coil and membrane, the recombinant SNARE complex in the phospholipid bilayer was studied using fluorescence quenching and site-directed spin labeling EPR. Fluorescence analysis revealed that two native Trp residues at the membrane-proximal region of the coiled coil are inserted into the membrane, tightly coupling the coiled coil to the membrane. The EPR results indicate that the coiled coil penetrates into the membrane with an oblique angle, providing a favorable geometry for the basic residues to interact with negatively charged lipids. The result supports the proposition that core complex formation directly leads to the apposition of two membranes, which could facilitate lipid mixing. Trp residues and basic residues are abundant at the membrane-proximal region of transmembrane SNARE proteins, suggesting the generality of the proposed mechanism for the SNARE complex-membrane coupling.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".