Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article cherche à retrouver les significations des mouvements de colonisation québécois au XIXe siècle. Les interprétations semblent rendre univoque ce phénomène aux multiples aspects. L'article ne retient pas les seules finalités agricoles et forestières. Les conduites des colons et le discours d'un leader colonisateur sont examinés. Le colon n'est pas tant vu comme agriculteur ou bûcheron que comme participant d'une tradition de mobilité (coureur de bois, voyageur, forestier, colon), c'est-à-dire du nomadisme québécois (dichotomie colon/habitant ou forêt/terre). La logique interne du mouvement est analysée à travers les idées de l'abbé Provost (1860-1880) sur l'ouverture de la Mattawinie (nord de Joliette, dans les Laurentides). On y trouve un plan d'occupation du territoire et de développement économique qui permet de critiquer l'étiquetage « agriculturiste » des leaders de la colonisation. Trois composantes principales se dégagent de ces idées : une stratégie géopolitique, un projet religieux, un développement économique par étapes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".