MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2035867285 · doi:10.1002/cjce.5450820116

Effect of the Equipment Configuration and Operating Conditions on Process Performance and on Physical Characteristics of the Product During Coating in Spouted Bed

2004· article· en· W2035867285 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
M C P Publio, Wanderley P. Oliveira

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGranular flow and fluidized beds
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsBody orificeCoatingVolumetric flow rateMass flow rateMaterials scienceDraft tubeMass flowComposite materialConical surfaceTube (container)Flow (mathematics)Annulus (botany)Analytical Chemistry (journal)Engineering drawingMechanicsChromatographyChemistryMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The effects of the configuration and operating conditions on the performance of the spouted bed tablet coating process have been studied. The configuration parameters analyzed were the ratio between the draft tube diameter and the inlet orifice diameter, d T /d i , and the conical base angle, γ. To analyze the equipment performance the adhesion coefficient, η, and the increase rate of the tablet mass, K 1 , were measured as a function of the mass flow rate of the coating material, W s , of the ratio between the mass feed flow rate of coating suspension relative to mass feed flow rate of the spouting gas, W* s /W* g , of the air flow rate relative to minimum spouting, Q/Q ms , and of the feed flow rate of atomising air, W at . Procedures for the evaluation of the growth kinetics and for measuring the product uniformity are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.220

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicGranular flow and fluidized bedsFrench-language works237,207